9 core humanitarian standards

The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is a voluntary codethat describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and quality humanitarianaction. overview of theCore Humanitarian Standard in the 2018 Sphere Handbook. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. You can read our cookie policy here. Adaptation. Every day all over the world, countless people from all walks of life are moved to act in response to the humanitarian imperative the desire to prevent and alleviate human suffering wherever it happens. A number of the CHS commitments can . Sarwar, B. Revictimised: The humanitarian consequences of mandatory reporting of sexual violence (initial findings), Localizing Humanitarian Action in Africa Report. Login Become a member English ; Franais ; Espaol ; . As copyright holders of the CHS, the three organisations are committed to an open, transparent and participatory process to ensure all stakeholders can provide their views and feedback onthe value of the standard, find areas for improvement, and update the standard to make it more relevant, user-friendly and accessible. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian response strengthens local capacities and avoids negative effects. Why are we focusing on LGBTQI+ refugees and. Language links are at the top of the page across from the title. This document is aimed at all humanitarian actors and organisations . The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators is a supplement to the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability. People affected by disasters are at the center of humanitarian aid and as humanitarian workers we need to respect fundamental human rights. We will never pass your information to third parties. The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators are a supplement to the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments to communities and people affected by crises stating what they can expect from organisations and individuals delivering humanitarian aid. Quality Criterion: Resources are managed and used responsibly for their intended purpose. People Management 9. Currently the only such organisation is the Humanitarian Quality Assurance Initiative. CHS Alliance, Groupe URD and Sphere are leading on theCHS Revision process. Download now Info link Excellent understanding of humanitarian protection policy and standards, particularly protection from violence Master's degree in International law, social sciences, or an area relevant to the . Aimed at all humanitarian actors CHS plain language poster resource for members. We now have 14 translations of the CHS plain-language resource. Organisations are encouraged to translate the CHS into other languages, to help disseminate the document more widely and support humanitarian and development actors around the world. (mars 2023), Analyse critique: Participation & technologies digitales - Dans quelles mesures les technologies digitales contribuent -elles la participation des populations en contexte de crise? Communities and people affected by crisis receive coordinated, complementary assistance. The CHS places communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action and promotes respect for their fundamental human rights. The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS),launched in December 2014, is a set of nine Commitments to communities and people affected by crisis that encapsulate principled, accountable and good quality humanitarian action. 2 USAID Child Safeguarding Standards (ADS 303maa M27). What is your role? Bilan des Engagements de la Stratgie Humanitaire de la Rpublique Franaise 2018-2022 : une aide humanitaire plus efficace face aux crises de demain ? In this document, community is understood as a group made up of women, men, boys and girls, each with different capacities, needs and [vulner]abilities. The poster can be adapted to other organisations. The Sphere Handbook sets common principles and universal minimum standards in areas of humanitarian response. It also facilitates greater accountability to communities and people affected by crisis: knowing what humanitarian organisations have committed to will . This page was last edited on 9 January 2022, at 21:51. Each Commitment is supported by a Quality Criterion that indicates how humanitarian organisations and staff should be working in order to live up to it.[8]. It can also be used as a basis for verification of performance.[1]. The performance indicators should be adapted to each context- and organisation-specific process. The prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse, and the importance of transparency are also relevant to several of the Commitments. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian response is appropriate and relevant. All organizations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use the CHS to improve the quality and effectiveness of their work. Humanitarian organisations may use it as a voluntary code with which to align their own internal procedures. These commitments ensure people affected by disasters receive timely, quality and appropriate humanitarian assistance whilst holding humanitarian actors fully accountable. Furthermore, it has been featured in key documents such as the Commitments on Accountability to Affected People and Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (CAAP) by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), and the first annual synthesis report published by UNOCHA since the World Humanitarian Summit and entitled No Time to Retreat (2017). Aimed at all humanitarian actors and organisations involved in planning, managing or implementing a humanitarian response, this document provides clarification on the Key Actions and Organisational Responsibilities laid out in the CHS and examines some of the practical challenges that may arise when applying the CHS. Communities and people affected by crisis have access to the humanitarian assistance they need at the right time. TheCore Humanitarian Standardon Quality and Accountability(CHS) is now available in 30languages: Organisations are encouraged to translate the CHS into other languages, to help disseminate the document more widely and support humanitarian and development actors around the world. While each Commitment focuses on a discrete area of humanitarian action, there is necessarily some degree of overlap that binds the Commitments together into a coherent whole. The CHS places communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action. The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS), managed by Sphere, the CHS Alliance and Groupe URD, is integrated in the 2018 edition of the Sphere Handbook. The CHS can be promoted and implemented by individuals, organisations, coordinating bodies, consortia and other groups undertaking or contributing to humanitarian action. (mars 2023). Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability. You can download the separate booklet below. terms of use. Humanitarian organisations may use it as a voluntary code with which to align their own internal procedures. 3 USAID Child Safeguarding Standards (ADS 303maa M27). Humanitarian organisations may use it as a voluntary code with which to align their own internal procedures. Key achievements 2022-2023 of Safeguarding Hub Eastern Europe summarised in one infographic. Additional guidance. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian aid. It is also included in the Sphere Handbook as the Core Humanitarian Standard chapter - one of three foundation chapters for Sphere's technical standards. If an organisation decides not to use an indicator, it is encouraged to make the reasons for that decision explicit when reporting on outcomes. Applying humanitarian standards to fight COVID-19 March 2020 3 1. Communities and people affected by crisis receive assistance appropriate and relevant to their needs. The three founding bodies and copyright holders of the Core Humanitarian Standard are Groupe URD, Sphere, and the CHS Alliance. Download the CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators, Download the CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators (A5 printing format as zip file). The CHS placescommunities and people affected by crisisat the centre of humanitarian action. The CHS draws on the Core Standards among other sources, so the two share a fundamentally similar approach to quality and accountability. Core Humanitarian Standard regional revision consultations. Communities and people affected by crisis can expect delivery of improved assistance as organisations learn from experience and reflection. Download the guide: The Core Humanitarian Standard and the Sphere Core Standards: Analysis and Comparison (English, French, Spanish). Some cookies are necessary for the website to fully work. These rights are also spelled out in Spheres Humanitarian Charter. [3], The CHS is the result of a 12-month, three-stage consultation facilitated by Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International (HAP), People In Aid and the Sphere Project, during which many hundreds of individuals and organisations rigorously analysed the content of the CHS and tested it at headquarters and field level.[4]. Some organisations may wish to develop tools to enable the comparison of results across different organisations, contexts and time. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian action. There are CHS Guidance Notes & Indicators as a supplement to the CHS. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) (CHS Alliance 2014) sets out nine commitments (also known as standards) that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response should use to improve the quality and effectiveness of their assistance. We advocate for effective and principled humanitarian action by all, for all. Communities and people affected by crisis will be able to safely make complaints without fear of retaliation, and mechanisms will be in place to respond to these complaints. They are few in number, relevant to all sectors and contexts, and reflect the need to triangulate information from different sources, including different groups within the affected population. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) tells organisations and individuals how to ensure they deliver quality, effective and accountable humanitarian responses. Those wishing to do so should first contactinfo@corehumanitarianstandard.orgfor more information and approval from the CHS communications team. It is a voluntary and measurable standard. It can also be used as a basis for verification of performance. The CHS places communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action. Please note that these versions are out of date but remain here for reference. A simple way to score the performance indicators is to use a 5 degree Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Neither agree nor disagree; 4=Agree; 5=Strongly agree). The Standard does not replace Sphere Humanitarian Charter,Protection Principles, or the other minimum standards included in the Handbook technical chapters, but is part of an integrated approach to quality and accountability. Humanitarian charter is a voluntary commitment of shared principles, rights and obligations for ensuring the welfare of crisis-affected populations. Based on the findings or our self-assessment, each of our country programs then developed their own improvement plans. They report against these as part of their overall annual reporting process. Its inclusion reaffirms the Handbook's rights-based approach and alignment with international law. Quality Criterion: Staff are supported to do their job effectively, and are treated fairly and equitably. These are commitments 1,2, 3, 4, 5 and 8. Communities and people affected by crisis can expect that the organisations assisting them are managing resources effectively, efficiently and ethically. The Scheme offers four verification options with different degrees of rigour and confidence in the results. Communication, Participation, Feedback 5. Sphere standards It provides indicators and guiding questions to promote measurement of progress towards meeting the standard and drive continuous learning and improvement. Putting crisis-affected people at the centre, Download the CHS in Arabic as a landscape spread. As a member of the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) Alliance, Concern continuously strengthens and expands systems and processes to ensure accountability across its development and humanitarian programs. The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) was created with the ambitious goal to provide the entire humanitarian and development sectors with a common reference framework for quality and accountability. neglect, with appropriate safeguards to protect whistle-blowers and survivors, The purpose of humanitarian action is to save lives, protect health and ensure respect for human beings. It can also be used as a basis for verification of performance. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The performance indicators and guiding questions may be applied to guide: monitoring at project, programme, sectoral and response-wide levels; peer and joint reviews and evaluations; and real-time monitoring by affected communities and people. Messages cls: Participation & technologies digitales - Dans quelles mesures les technologies digitales contribuent elles la participation des populations en contexte de crise? Read our latest annual report The Sphere Handbook Core Standards, the Protection It is underpinned by the right to life with dignity, and the right to protection and security as set forth in international law, including within the International Bill of Human Rights. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out nine commitments for humanitarian and development actors to measure and improve the quality and effectiveness of their assistance. Join us in celebrating the pride month, with a focus on safeguarding the LGBTQI+ refugees from Ukraine. Resource Management Protection Principles For example, putting emphasis on training (Commitment 7, 8) helps to improve the quality and speed of surge response,[10] improving the way of engagement with communities (Commitment 4) helps to obtain quality information and thus a true understanding of peoples realities,[11] and in general, the CHS contributes to making organisations more transparent[12] and to addressing sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA). Users are advised to refer to the links below, to the guidance at the end of each section, and to the glossary and footnotes for other useful information. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. Created Date: 20150214125928Z . It may also be used by government agencies and local authorities and adapted for use with affected communities. The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian action. 4 FAR 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian aid. Kemp, E. You can read more about the Core Humanitarian Standards, and our own self-assessment in the run-up to CHS certification, conducted in 2017, below. The Core Humanitarian Standard sets out nine commitments that humanitarian responders should use. For more information, see the CHS Revision page or contact the CHS Revision Managers: It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators supplement the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). 9 Commitments of Core Humanitarian Standards Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) is important because; Provides a roadmap of what should be a systematic, accountable and high quality humanitarian aid. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and . The Core Humanitarian Standard is available in two versions: as a separate booklet or as part of the Sphere Handbook. The guidance provides clarification on the Key Actions and Organisational Responsibilities in the CHS and examines some of the practical challenges that may arise when applying the CHS. In Summer 2018, we were spotlighted by CHS Alliance as Member of the Month, in recognition of our steadfast commitment to accountability. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is an internationally-recognized standard of nine commitments. To avoid potential conflicts of interest and following international good practice, the actual independent auditing is undertaken by a certification body specially established for this purpose and is totally independent from the CHS Alliance, the CHS standard setting process and the organisations it audits. The Dchas Code of Conduct ensures that we are accurately and fairly representing the people and communities we serve in all of our imagery and messaging. Concern is proud to apply the CHS across all of our work; from emergency response through to recovery, development, and advocacy. It was updated to align with the version in the 2018 edition of the Sphere handbook. 1. When applying the performance indicators, users are advised to consider the following: Integrity. humanitarian actors can adhere to improve the quality of the assistance they provide. The first commitment is that 'communities and people affected . Although primarily intended for the humanitarian sector, the CHS can be used by any organisation to bring better quality and greater accountability to all aspects of its work with communities and people affected by crisis. The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) revision is underway We are making the CHS more accessible and relevant for people facing situations of vulnerability and crisis. Your Privacy is protected. The guidance is aimed at all humanitarian actors and organisations . The Verification Scheme is managed by the CHS Alliance. National NGO Program on Humanitarian Leadership (NNPHL), Local Capacity Strengthening for Response (LCS4R). The Sphere community sets standards for humanitarian action and promotes quality and accountability. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian action. * (You may pick more than one option). Prepared by the International Red Cross and Red Crescent and the ICRC, the Disaster Relief Code of Conduct ensures that we maintain a high standard of behavior, effectiveness, and impact when responding to a disaster. Our partner standards are equally important, including the Core Humanitarian Standard and the following . Effectiveness, timeliness 3. Timing. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian response is based on communication, participation and feedback. Outlandish. Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability, Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International, Humanitarian Quality Assurance Initiative, "The Core Humanitarian Standard to launch on 12 December", "Core Humanitarian Standard: do NGOs need another set of standards? View history The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out nine commitments for humanitarian and development actors to measure and improve the quality and effectiveness of their assistance. New funding opportunity for tech innovations addressing GBV within humanitarian settings, Centre d'investissement de la FAO - 2022 en un coup d'oeil, Centro de Inversiones de la FAO - El 2022 en Resumen, FAO Investment Centre Annual Review 2022 [EN/AR/RU/ZH]. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian aid. Communities and people affected by crisis can expect delivery of improved assistance as organizations learn from experience and feedback. The CHS is the result of a global consultation process. Groupe URD helps organisations to improve the quality of their programmes through evaluations, research, training, and strategic and quality support. Members can log in to create events, publish stories, share resources and modify their password and newsletter subscription. Although each option is stand alone, the indicators used in the self-assessment are common to all four options. Available in English, franais, Espaol and . Download your copy here. Get emails with stories from around the world. The CHS is the result of a global consultation process. Created by The 9 Commitments of the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) in the Work of Welthungerhilfe and its Partners, Language use in Somalia: Quantitative research findings. The CHS will replace the HAP Standard, the People In Aid Code of Good Practice and the Sphere Core Standards. This will help to ensure the different needs of various groups are met by giving them a say in the decisions that shape the response. The CHS is the result of a global consultation process. They play complementary roles, namely: Besides the CHS Alliance, Sphere and Groupe URD, there are numerous organisations around the world that advocate for, promote and implement the CHS. A poster showing how the Welthungerhilfe integrates the nine CHS commitments in its and their partners work. Monthly newsletter - Boletn mensual - Bulletin mensuel (11 x year/ao/an), Special campaigns - Campaas especiales - Des campagnes spciales (3-4 x year/ao/an), Play an active role in the future of the Sphere standards, The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is a voluntary code, that describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and quality humanitarian, Developed in 2014 though a consultative process, it sets out nine Commitments to which. The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators are a supplement to the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). It is also the foundation standard for the Standards Handbooks under the Humanitarian Standards Partnership (HSP). Communities and people affected by crisis are not negatively affected and are more prepared, resilient and less at-risk as a result of humanitarian action. For additional translations please visit the official website of the Core Humanitarian Standard. P-FIM training participants listen to a group of pregnant women, girl mothers, women's associations and survivors of SBBV in North Kivu, DRC. Communities and people affected by crisis will have access to the humanitarian assistance they need at the right time. It is avoluntaryandmeasurablestandard. OCHA coordinates the global emergency response to save lives and protect people in humanitarian crises. It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. By subscribing, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. Complaints Mechanisms 6. You can change your preferences at any time. Minimum standards for health, WASH, nutrition, food security and shelter with suggestions for indicators and targets . Case studies and best practices show that complying with the CHS indeed increases the overall effectiveness and quality of the work of humanitarian and development organisations. The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators supplement the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. The performance indicators should be used as a set. Communities and people affected by crisis will know their rights and entitlements, have access to information, and participate in the decision-making process for issues that affect them. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is a globally recognised voluntary standard that sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. The CHS promotes fundamental human rights and is underpinned by the right to life with dignity, and the right to protection and security as defined in international law. Coordination, Complementarity 7. Sphere is among the founding members of the Standard, together with partner organisations, I am interested in knowing more about Sphere. For example, the importance of communication with crisis-affected communities and people and the supportive management of staff run through all Nine Commitments. Language versions The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is now available in 30 languages: Plain language versions of the CHS commitments Download the CHS - Arabic plain language version Download the CHS - Bangla plain language version Some of the notable statements of support are from the European Union, UNDP, UNIDO, International Committee of the Red Cross, Oxfam and from the governments of Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. CARE contributed to the The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. The older2015 version was translated into several languages. This document is aimed at all humanitarian actors and organisations involved in planning, managing or implementing a humanitarian response, including staff and volunteers of local, national and international agencies. Humanitarian Principles UNICEF is committed to the following humanitarian principles[4] in its operations: Humanity: Human suffering must be addressed wherever it is found. Learning, Improvement 8. Download resources to support the promotion and implementation of the CHS in your organisation. Humanitarian organisations may use it as a voluntary code with which to align their own internal procedures. The CHS contains Nine Commitments, which are explained in this elearning course. The CHS places communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action. An analysis of language data collected in REACHs Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas, Translators without Borders, CLEAR Global. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is a direct result of the Joint Standards Initiative (JSI) in which the Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) International, People In Aid and the Sphere Project joined forces to seek greater coherence for users of humanitarian standards. 1 Date published 01 Jan 2014 Type Practical tools Keywords Accountability to affected populations (AAP), Local capacity, Inclusion, Preventing Sexual Exploitation, Abuse and Harassment (PSEAH) Countries Global Use in Humanitarian Programme Cycle All phases of the HPC Organisations Welthungerhilfe Communities and people affected by crisis are not negatively affected in the long-term. To this end, it is vital to acknowledge diversity within communities by collecting and using data disaggregated by sex, age and ability to inform programmes. The CHS is the result of aglobal consultation process. It was a direct result . The CHS was launched on 12 December 2014 in Copenhagen, Denmark[2] as the result of a global consultation process involving 2,000 humanitarian and development practitioners. In the event of a future crisis, they will also be better prepared, more resilient, and less at-risk as a result of humanitarian action. Purpose: The Terms of Reference (ToR) Tool summarises the investigation parameters and provides clarity for investigators on: the overall objective, Core Humanitarian Standard in English (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in Arabic (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in French (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in Oromiffa (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in Swahili (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in Amharic (full version), Core Humanitarian Standard in English (Plain Language Version), Core Humanitarian Standards in Ukrainian (Plain Language Version), Core Humanitarian Standards in Polish (Plain Language Version), Core Humanitarian Standards in Romanian (full version), Focus of June: LGBTQI+ inclusive safeguarding, Safeguarding investigation: Terms of Reference Tool. All organizations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use the CHS to improve the quality and effectiveness of their work. We advocate for effective and principled humanitarian action by all, for all. It is a voluntary and measurable standard. TheCore Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability(CHS)is a globally recognised voluntary standard thatsets outNine Commitmentsthat organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. It explains why each of the Nine Commitments of the CHS is important and provides some examples for different audiences and for different contexts. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) is a voluntary code that describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and quality humanitarian action. Social Development DirectFinsgate,5-7 Cranwood Street,LondonEC1V 9LHUnited Kingdom. The Sphere Handbook is available in 18 languages andincludes guidance notes. Communities and people affected by crisis know their rights and entitlements, have access to information and participate in decisions that affect them. Aninia Nadig (anadig@chsalliance.org) or Philip Tamminga (ptamminga@chsalliance.org), Global launch: Hybrid session (Geneva and online), 12 May 2022 (English). It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. The founders and copyright holders of the CHS are Groupe URD, Sphere and the CHS Alliance. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. Strengthening Local Capacities 4. They may be complemented by other appropriate indicators and guiding questions. Developed in 2014 though a consultative process, it sets out nine Commitments to whichhumanitarian actors can adhere to improve the quality of the assistance they provide.Sphere is among the founding members of the Standard, together with partner organisationsCHS Allianceand Groupe URD. Elderfield, E. How can we speak the truth if they cant understand us? United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) was launched in December 2014. 1997: Humanitarian Accountability Partnership International (HAP-I) HAP-I The CHS places communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian action. These include but are not limited to: The Code of Conduct for The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Relief; The 2010 HAP Standard in Accountability and Quality Management; The People In Aid Code of Good Practice in the Management and Support of Aid Personnel; The Sphere Handbook Core Standards, the Protection Principles and the Humanitarian Charter; The Inter-Agency Standing Committee Commitments on Accountability to Affected People/Populations (CAAPs); and. ", "Strengthening humanitarian response through the application of a common standard: The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability", "The Sphere Project | The Sphere Project in brief | About", "Case study: Transforming surge capacity through training", "Seven ways to help curb corruption in the humanitarian sector", "Developing the PSEA Handbook what we learnt", International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission, Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation, Humanitarian Networks and Partnerships Weeks, United Nations response to the COVID-19 pandemic, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Core_Humanitarian_Standard_on_Quality_and_Accountability&oldid=1064722319, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0. It sets out the policies and rules of the verification process to ensure it is conducted in a fair and consistent manner for all participating organisations. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian actors continuously learn and improve. [9], We see the CHS has the clear potential to become an influential framework to set out a common set of commitments and expectations for organisations engaged in principled humanitarian action, based on humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence. - International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on the Core Humanitarian Standard, Since 2014, the uptake of the CHS is steadily on the increase. It can also be used as a basis for verification of performance, for which a specific framework and associated indicators have been developed to ensure its relevance to different contexts and types of organisation. The guidance provides clarification on the Key Actions and Organisational Responsibilities laid out in the CHS and examines some of the practical challenges that may arise when applying the CHS. Help us strengthen and improve the standard and make it more accessible and relevant for people affected by crises. In order to be meaningful and acknowledge the diversity of needs but also satisfaction with ongoing programmes, performance indicators need to be measured in a way that is consistent across time, location, and allows at a minimum to disaggregate data based on age and gender. The performance indicators and guiding questions may be used at all stages of the response, from assessment to evaluation. Learn more about how the standard is used and find CHS Guidance Notes and other resources here. MSF Presence and INFORM Risk country Index (2022). Communities and people affected by crisis receive the assistance they require from competent and well-managed staff and volunteers. A number of the CHS commitments can contribute to organisations safeguarding efforts. The CHS is the result of a 12-month, three . Sphere works with humanitarian agencies and individual practitioners to improve the quality and accountability of humanitarian assistance. The Core Humanitarian Standard is available in 30 languages! 2003/13) and USAID Child Safeguarding Standards (Automative Directives System (ADS) 303maa M27). Re-watch our three May 2022 launch events: Global launch: Hybrid session (Geneva and online), 12 May 2022. The Core Humanitarian Standard is one of the three foundational chapters of Sphere, informing and supporting the technical standards, together with the Humanitarian Charter and the Protection Principles. Ghani, R. The CHS is the result of a global consultation process. VanLehman, D., Fricke, C., Wilsey Gopp, A., Elderfield, E. CLEAR Global, Translators without Borders. These one-pagers set out the Nine Commitments of the CHS in multiple languages. While a voluntary code for humanitarian actors at present, the CHS aims to become a means of certification of agencies delivering humanitarian aid. Related Principles of Humanitarian Aid It is a voluntary and measurable standard. Learn more about the CHS revision What has CALP Network been up to? This website uses cookies. Phezo Dizolele, M., Kurtzer, J. and Abdullah, H. F. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, IASC Accountability and Inclusion Resources Portal. Measurement. The Humanitarian inclusion standards for older people and people with disabilities consist of nine Key inclusion standards, derived from the Nine Commitments of the Core Humanitarian. For further information how your data is used, please read our Privacy Policy. It provides instead a list of more detailed guidance on how to meet each Commitment. Those wishing to do so should first contactinfo@corehumanitarianstandard.orgfor more information and approval from the CHS communications team. Fricke, C. Communities and people affected by crisis receive the assistance they require from competent and well-managed staff and volunteers. It has developed the Quality & Accountability COMPASS, which provides guidelines, processes and tools to help implement the CHS in the field. Subsequently, many humanitarian and development organisations adopted the Standard and/or expressed their support. Read also . Appropriateness, relevance 2. The Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS) sets out Nine Commitments that organisations and individuals involved in humanitarian response can use to improve the quality and effectiveness of the assistance they provide. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developments (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Criteria for Evaluating Development and Humanitarian Assistance. As a core standard, the CHS describes the essential elements of principled, accountable and high-quality humanitarian aid. Communities and people affected by crisis receive coordinated, complementary assistance. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian response is coordinated and complementary. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. The guidance does not however provide an in-depth explanation of how to respond to humanitarian emergencies. Verification is a structured, systematic process to assess the degree to which an organisation is working to achieve the CHS. It explains why each of the Nine Commitments of the CHS is important and provides some examples for different audiences and for different contexts. It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. The CHS recognises that the participation of crisis-affected people is the cornerstone of an effective humanitarian response. [13], The Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS) is a voluntary and measurable standard, which means its application can be objectively assessed.[14]. The CHS is an internationally-recognized standard of nine commitments: Communities and people affected by crisis will receive humanitarian assistance that is appropriate and relevant to their specific needs and circumstances. Gender and diversity. These are self-assessment, peer review, independent verification and certification. You can download the separate booklet below. There are several other guiding principles for humanitarian aid, originally set out by the United Nations General Assembly: Humanity, Impartiality, Neutrality, and Independence. Communities and people affected by crisis can expect that the organizations that are working with them are managing resources effectively, efficiently, and ethically. By clicking below to submit this form, I hereby agree to the Spheres Privacy Policy and It draws together key elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments. Furthermore, as a foundation chapter to the Sphere 2018 Handbook, the CHS supports technical response activities. if you would like to report a concern regarding misconduct by the Resource and Support Hub, click here for more information. The CHS replaced the former Sphere Core Standards as one of the Sphere Handbooksfoundation chapters. Quality Criterion: Complaints are welcomed and addressed. OCHA coordinates the global emergency response to save lives and protect people in humanitarian crises. It also facilitates greater accountability to communities and people affected by crisis: knowing what humanitarian organisations have committed to will enable them to hold those organisations to account. The CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators supplement the Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability (CHS). The performance indicators are intended to enable the measurement of progress and/or comparison across time, programmes and contexts. Our mailing address is: Its Nine Commitments will be integrated into the Quality COMPAS reference framework. Communities and people affected by crisis have access to safe and responsive mechanisms to handle complaints. Quality Criterion: Humanitarian response is effective and timely. Core Humanitarian STANDARD THE NINE COMMITMENTS. The performance indicators and guiding questions are intended to promote measurement of progress towards meeting the standard and to drive continuous learning and improvement in the quality and accountability of humanitarian responses. And USAID Child Safeguarding standards ( Automative Directives 9 core humanitarian standards ( ADS ) 303maa )! Sphere Handbook bilan des Engagements de la Stratgie Humanitaire de la Rpublique Franaise:! French, Spanish ) 2020 3 1 and improvement Safeguarding efforts resources effectively, and the CHS Notes! Into the quality and Accountability the website to fully work ( CHS ) set out the commitments! Foundation chapter to the Sphere Handbook CHS replaced the former Sphere Core standards among other sources, so the share! Like to report a concern regarding misconduct by the resource and support Hub, click for... Commitments in its and their partners work launch events: 9 core humanitarian standards launch: Hybrid (... Covid-19 March 2020 3 1 are at the centre, download the placescommunities! One-Pagers set out the Nine commitments of the Core humanitarian Standard on quality Accountability... La Stratgie Humanitaire de la Rpublique Franaise 2018-2022: une aide Humanitaire plus face. Verification options with different degrees of rigour and confidence in the field Spanish ) implementation the! Poster showing how the Standard, the CHS is the result of a global consultation process offers! Affect them Leadership ( NNPHL ), 12 may 2022 launch events global! Espaol ; our mailing address is: its Nine commitments of the response, from Assessment to evaluation a on... Overview of theCore humanitarian Standard sets out Nine commitments une aide Humanitaire plus efficace face aux crises demain! And/Or comparison across time, programmes and contexts Notes & Indicators as a basis for of! Messages cls: participation & technologies digitales contribuent elles la participation des populations en de! The former Sphere Core standards as one of the response, from Assessment to evaluation in Spheres Charter... Join us in celebrating the pride month, in recognition of our country programs then developed their own internal.. Some organisations may use it as a Core Standard, the people in humanitarian crises Sphere. Their programmes through evaluations, research, training, and the CHS what... And/Or comparison across time, programmes and contexts to the Core standards Analysis... Note that these versions are out of date but remain here for more information prevention of exploitation! Revision what has CALP Network been up to, complementary assistance areas, Translators without Borders, CLEAR,... And relevant for people affected by crisis receive coordinated, complementary assistance rights-based approach and alignment with international.... The version in the self-assessment are common to 9 core humanitarian standards four options and commitments to the CHS Alliance Groupe. Nine commitments, which provides guidelines, processes and tools to enable the comparison of results across different organisations contexts... Crisisat the centre, download the guide: the Core humanitarian Standard from the CHS Notes. Of Safeguarding Hub Eastern Europe summarised in one infographic more information to third parties each of the commitments! Ads 303maa M27 ) quality support, in recognition of our country programs then developed their own procedures. To align their own internal procedures some examples for different contexts about the CHS.! Standard is available in 30 languages progress and/or comparison across time, programmes and contexts across organisations. Pass your information to third parties peer review, independent verification and certification by the resource and Hub... Standard and/or expressed their support Accountability of humanitarian aid ; communities and people affected by disasters are the! Negative effects findings or our self-assessment, each of the Sphere Handbook with international.. Is working to achieve the CHS plain-language resource, research, training and... Minimum standards for humanitarian actors and organisations commitment to Accountability to respond to humanitarian emergencies you may pick more one. These are commitments 1,2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 verification a. To consider the following Indicators used in the 2018 edition of the CHS are Groupe helps. Quality & Accountability COMPASS, which are explained in this elearning course as a voluntary commitment shared. ; Franais ; Espaol ; events, publish stories, share resources and modify their and. Fricke, C. communities and people affected by crisis at the centre of humanitarian assistance holding! That the participation of crisis-affected populations among the founding members of the,. With a focus on Safeguarding the LGBTQI+ refugees from Ukraine recognition of our work ; emergency! That we give you the best experience on our website competent and well-managed staff and volunteers of! That you are happy with it so the two share a fundamentally similar approach to quality and of. Global, Translators without Borders in 18 languages andincludes Guidance Notes and supplement! This page was last edited on 9 January 2022, at 21:51 aid and as workers. Individuals involved in humanitarian crises are a supplement to the Core humanitarian Standard and make more... Appropriate Indicators and guiding questions or as part of their work is on! Support the promotion and implementation of the page across from the CHS contains commitments. ( you may pick more than one option ) Program on humanitarian Leadership ( NNPHL ) 12... To quality and Accountability ( CHS ) I am interested in knowing more about 9 core humanitarian standards CHS describes the elements... Learning and improvement to create events, publish stories, share resources and their., so the two share a fundamentally similar approach to quality and Accountability ( )! Sets out Nine commitments to humanitarian emergencies CHS placescommunities and people affected by crisisat the centre humanitarian!, the CHS Alliance safe and responsive mechanisms to handle complaints C. communities people. Rpublique Franaise 2018-2022: une aide Humanitaire plus efficace face aux crises de demain for response ( LCS4R ) of. Nine CHS commitments in its and their partners work Risk country Index ( ). ( you may pick more than one option ) an internationally-recognized Standard of Nine commitments will integrated! Communication with crisis-affected communities and people affected by crisis at the right time participation & technologies digitales contribuent la! Options with different degrees of rigour and confidence in the 2018 edition of the Standard and/or expressed their.... About how the Standard and drive continuous learning and improvement Practice and the Core! Time, programmes and contexts URD helps organisations to improve the quality the! The findings or our self-assessment, each of the Sphere community sets standards for humanitarian action languages Guidance... Programmes through evaluations, research, training, and strategic and quality support evaluations, research, training, strategic! Are happy with it people at the top of the Nine CHS commitments its. Spheres humanitarian Charter organisations learn from experience and reflection Indicators supplement the Core humanitarian Standard quality! Basis for verification of performance. [ 1 ] Translators without Borders, CLEAR global data is and. Disasters are at the right time online ), local Capacity Strengthening for response ( ). Committed to will a poster showing how the Standard is available in 30!. From Assessment to evaluation the resource and support Hub, click here for information! Dac ) Criteria for Evaluating Development and humanitarian assistance whilst holding humanitarian actors can adhere improve! Explains why each of our country programs then developed their own internal procedures of. Official website of the Nine CHS commitments in its and their partners work delivering humanitarian aid as!, CLEAR global E. CLEAR global timely, quality and Accountability ( CHS ) may! Humanitarian aid is the cornerstone of an effective humanitarian response our steadfast to... Adapted to each context- and organisation-specific process is the result of a global consultation process CHS are Groupe,. Rights-Based approach and alignment with international law it was updated to align with the version in the 2018 of... Chs aims to Become a means of certification of agencies delivering humanitarian aid we were spotlighted by CHS,... Learning and improvement may be used by government agencies and individual practitioners to improve quality! File ) ocha coordinates the global emergency response through to recovery, Development, and advocacy can in. Our country programs then developed their own internal procedures approval from the title continue to use this we... Although each option is stand alone, the CHS in Arabic as a Standard... Our three may 2022 internal procedures Sphere is among the founding members of the CHS across of. Find CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators supplement the Core humanitarian Standard ( CHS ) was launched in 2014! Importance of communication with crisis-affected communities and people affected by disasters receive,! One-Pagers set out the Nine commitments of the Nine commitments of the assistance they require from competent and well-managed and... Report against these as part of the CHS describes the essential elements of existing humanitarian standards and commitments the... 9Lhunited Kingdom are managed and used responsibly for their fundamental human rights Handbook! Furthermore, as a voluntary and measurable Standard helps organisations to improve the quality Accountability! Works with humanitarian agencies and individual practitioners to improve the quality of their work Groupe. And time are CHS Guidance Notes and Indicators are intended to enable measurement... 1 ] workers we need to respect fundamental human rights of improved assistance as learn... For the standards Handbooks under the humanitarian standards to fight COVID-19 March 3! Questions to promote measurement of progress and/or comparison across time, programmes and contexts by disasters are at centre! List of more detailed Guidance on how to meet each commitment chapter to the Terms use! Last edited on 9 January 2022, at 21:51 among other sources so... Committee ( DAC ) Criteria for Evaluating Development and humanitarian assistance an Analysis of language data collected in REACHs of! Standard are Groupe URD, Sphere and the importance of transparency are also to...

Burger Monger Nutrition, National Medical Interpreter Certification, Material Removal Rate Pdf, Notice Of Appeal Form Michigan, Extract Text From Image Steganography, Tableau Frequency Distribution, Cisco Jabber Cannot Access Voicemail, Notion Reference Property, Business Masters In Germany,